![]() |
For your PC needs
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fast flirting
Fast flirting
By Sue Ostler March 19, 2005 Icon Photo: Kate Oliver <http://www.smh.com.au/news/Icon/Fast-flirting/2005/03/17/1110913718477.html> Forget cyber love, mobile-phone dating is fast, furious and immediate - perfect for young people who are surrounded by disposable items. Don't fancy the dude or dudette in question? Simply delete and dial on. "Finding your perfect match has never been so easy," declares the press release introducing a brand spanking new service which came about when a couple of clever bods from Australia's largest online dating service, RSVP, and Hutchison Telecom's 3G mobile service, the 3 network, got together to announce the launch of RSVP on 3. "It is an inevitable evolution to the online dating phenomenon and will be quickly adopted by daters who want access to instant loving any time," says RSVP's marketing manager, Melanie Bowman. It's all part of the frantically paced modernisation of dating. It's quick, easy and at your fingertips. Singles cruise their dial pads to unearth prospects' profiles with options to view photos and videos, search sexy profiles and send and receive "kisses" and flirty chats. You can get it when you're walking your dog, drinking at your local, slumped over the desk at work, in the bath or going for a run - you can get it anywhere. So what about, erm, chemistry? Or pheromones? Or that funny flutter you get when you meet someone who floats your boat and pushes all your buttons? What is left of the mystery and art of romance if we are so accessible, so very easy to contact and, if desired, to make a move on? Are we further demystifying the ages-old art of face-to-face flirting, the meaning of communication? One 3 network customer, 26-year-old Millie, who works "crazy hours" in hospitality, thinks not. "It's kinda fun. Lots of people in the hospitality industry don't have access to a PC and they work long, irregular hours. We don't get to meet many new people," Millie says. It can also make you feel a little more flirtatious, and like any blind date, "you just go for it", Millie says. She thinks the new service provides enough information to make a decision about whether to take things further. And it feels a little more secure and more accessible than online dating. "It opens up that face-to-face contact and gets you out of that awkward position of being on a date with someone you don't feel comfortable with. "It's also quite a confidence booster and it's fun getting the attention. It can make communication move a lot faster as your phone's right with you. It's a way of meeting them without having to go through the actual meeting." Sure, but what happens after you've exchanged a bit of flirty chat and shared a few "kisses" - who initiates the actual "mobile date" and does it cost anything? Either party can initiate the date and, yes, it does cost: it's $39.95 for five "stamps" (that breaks down to $7.99 for each date - the equivalent of a vodka and tonic in a swanky bar). Will Millie initiate a date? "Yes," she smiles. "I've had a couple of kisses and I'm thinking about it." Does it feel strange paying for the first date? "No," she says, "but then I'm not a traditionalist." Kerri, a 32-year-old editor, couldn't think of anything worse. "There are plenty of people who really enjoy the many and varied features of mobile phones, but speaking as a Luddite who almost didn't go on a phone plan because I had to get a phone with more than the most basic operations, it's not for me ... in the same way as WAP, polyphonic ringtones and downloading movie clips aren't for me," she says. "The kind of person who'd get into mobile dating wouldn't be my type, if only because he'd find me depressingly old-fashioned." It's really a matter of personal choice. And whether we want our personal mobiles to transform into frenzied love machines. Allowing the possibility of a random romance to infiltrate our lives 24/7 without warning may be wildly exciting for some but intrusive for others. "Email dating is one thing, at least things happen at a manageable pace," Kerri says. "Imagine if you were sitting at your desk at work and you started getting bombarded with text messages from someone you didn't even know. I bet that in a few years' time, mobile dating will not only be commonplace, but will have made massive advances ... for now, I'll stick to making my advances over the internet, or even at the pub." But you can't stop progress, especially when it comes to one of the most commercial markets in the world. After all, research shows that looking for love in cyberspace is one of the most successful ways to find a partner, so this seems the next logical step. And hey, why not? If you can manage mobile dating without looking like you're doing a bad Rove interview - go for it. Sue Ostler runs monthly workshops entitled Flirt with Flair. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
Wota fucking wanker.
Charlie Wong <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7tan31h4o74otjlvapnboacs1ug4la5rda@4ax.com... > Fast flirting > By Sue Ostler > March 19, 2005 > Icon > Photo: Kate Oliver > <http://www.smh.com.au/news/Icon/Fast-flirting/2005/03/17/1110913718477.html> > > Forget cyber love, mobile-phone dating is fast, furious and immediate > - perfect for young people who are surrounded by disposable items. > Don't fancy the dude or dudette in question? Simply delete and dial > on. > > "Finding your perfect match has never been so easy," declares the > press release introducing a brand spanking new service which came > about when a couple of clever bods from Australia's largest online > dating service, RSVP, and Hutchison Telecom's 3G mobile service, the 3 > network, got together to announce the launch of RSVP on 3. > > "It is an inevitable evolution to the online dating phenomenon and > will be quickly adopted by daters who want access to instant loving > any time," says RSVP's marketing manager, Melanie Bowman. > > It's all part of the frantically paced modernisation of dating. It's > quick, easy and at your fingertips. Singles cruise their dial pads to > unearth prospects' profiles with options to view photos and videos, > search sexy profiles and send and receive "kisses" and flirty chats. > You can get it when you're walking your dog, drinking at your local, > slumped over the desk at work, in the bath or going for a run - you > can get it anywhere. > > So what about, erm, chemistry? Or pheromones? Or that funny flutter > you get when you meet someone who floats your boat and pushes all your > buttons? > > What is left of the mystery and art of romance if we are so > accessible, so very easy to contact and, if desired, to make a move > on? Are we further demystifying the ages-old art of face-to-face > flirting, the meaning of communication? One 3 network customer, > 26-year-old Millie, who works "crazy hours" in hospitality, thinks > not. > > "It's kinda fun. Lots of people in the hospitality industry don't have > access to a PC and they work long, irregular hours. We don't get to > meet many new people," Millie says. > > It can also make you feel a little more flirtatious, and like any > blind date, "you just go for it", Millie says. She thinks the new > service provides enough information to make a decision about whether > to take things further. > > And it feels a little more secure and more accessible than online > dating. "It opens up that face-to-face contact and gets you out of > that awkward position of being on a date with someone you don't feel > comfortable with. > > "It's also quite a confidence booster and it's fun getting the > attention. It can make communication move a lot faster as your phone's > right with you. It's a way of meeting them without having to go > through the actual meeting." > > Sure, but what happens after you've exchanged a bit of flirty chat and > shared a few "kisses" - who initiates the actual "mobile date" and > does it cost anything? > > Either party can initiate the date and, yes, it does cost: it's $39.95 > for five "stamps" (that breaks down to $7.99 for each date - the > equivalent of a vodka and tonic in a swanky bar). > > Will Millie initiate a date? "Yes," she smiles. "I've had a couple of > kisses and I'm thinking about it." Does it feel strange paying for the > first date? "No," she says, "but then I'm not a traditionalist." > > Kerri, a 32-year-old editor, couldn't think of anything worse. "There > are plenty of people who really enjoy the many and varied features of > mobile phones, but speaking as a Luddite who almost didn't go on a > phone plan because I had to get a phone with more than the most basic > operations, it's not for me ... in the same way as WAP, polyphonic > ringtones and downloading movie clips aren't for me," she says. > > "The kind of person who'd get into mobile dating wouldn't be my type, > if only because he'd find me depressingly old-fashioned." > > It's really a matter of personal choice. And whether we want our > personal mobiles to transform into frenzied love machines. Allowing > the possibility of a random romance to infiltrate our lives 24/7 > without warning may be wildly exciting for some but intrusive for > others. > > "Email dating is one thing, at least things happen at a manageable > pace," Kerri says. > > "Imagine if you were sitting at your desk at work and you started > getting bombarded with text messages from someone you didn't even > know. I bet that in a few years' time, mobile dating will not only be > commonplace, but will have made massive advances ... for now, I'll > stick to making my advances over the internet, or even at the pub." > > But you can't stop progress, especially when it comes to one of the > most commercial markets in the world. After all, research shows that > looking for love in cyberspace is one of the most successful ways to > find a partner, so this seems the next logical step. And hey, why not? > If you can manage mobile dating without looking like you're doing a > bad Rove interview - go for it. > > Sue Ostler runs monthly workshops entitled Flirt with Flair. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> said
> Wota fucking wanker. > I thought that was the whole idea of it...... -- Kwyj. (Remove my smelly jocks to reply by email) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
Hang in there Rod, they might get this sort of thing up for poofters yet.
Then you can have a go too. "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3a1om3F653frbU1@individual.net... > Wota fucking wanker. > > Charlie Wong <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:7tan31h4o74otjlvapnboacs1ug4la5rda@4ax.com... >> Fast flirting >> By Sue Ostler >> March 19, 2005 >> Icon >> Photo: Kate Oliver >> <http://www.smh.com.au/news/Icon/Fast-flirting/2005/03/17/1110913718477.html> >> >> Forget cyber love, mobile-phone dating is fast, furious and immediate >> - perfect for young people who are surrounded by disposable items. >> Don't fancy the dude or dudette in question? Simply delete and dial >> on. >> >> "Finding your perfect match has never been so easy," declares the >> press release introducing a brand spanking new service which came >> about when a couple of clever bods from Australia's largest online >> dating service, RSVP, and Hutchison Telecom's 3G mobile service, the 3 >> network, got together to announce the launch of RSVP on 3. >> >> "It is an inevitable evolution to the online dating phenomenon and >> will be quickly adopted by daters who want access to instant loving >> any time," says RSVP's marketing manager, Melanie Bowman. >> >> It's all part of the frantically paced modernisation of dating. It's >> quick, easy and at your fingertips. Singles cruise their dial pads to >> unearth prospects' profiles with options to view photos and videos, >> search sexy profiles and send and receive "kisses" and flirty chats. >> You can get it when you're walking your dog, drinking at your local, >> slumped over the desk at work, in the bath or going for a run - you >> can get it anywhere. >> >> So what about, erm, chemistry? Or pheromones? Or that funny flutter >> you get when you meet someone who floats your boat and pushes all your >> buttons? >> >> What is left of the mystery and art of romance if we are so >> accessible, so very easy to contact and, if desired, to make a move >> on? Are we further demystifying the ages-old art of face-to-face >> flirting, the meaning of communication? One 3 network customer, >> 26-year-old Millie, who works "crazy hours" in hospitality, thinks >> not. >> >> "It's kinda fun. Lots of people in the hospitality industry don't have >> access to a PC and they work long, irregular hours. We don't get to >> meet many new people," Millie says. >> >> It can also make you feel a little more flirtatious, and like any >> blind date, "you just go for it", Millie says. She thinks the new >> service provides enough information to make a decision about whether >> to take things further. >> >> And it feels a little more secure and more accessible than online >> dating. "It opens up that face-to-face contact and gets you out of >> that awkward position of being on a date with someone you don't feel >> comfortable with. >> >> "It's also quite a confidence booster and it's fun getting the >> attention. It can make communication move a lot faster as your phone's >> right with you. It's a way of meeting them without having to go >> through the actual meeting." >> >> Sure, but what happens after you've exchanged a bit of flirty chat and >> shared a few "kisses" - who initiates the actual "mobile date" and >> does it cost anything? >> >> Either party can initiate the date and, yes, it does cost: it's $39.95 >> for five "stamps" (that breaks down to $7.99 for each date - the >> equivalent of a vodka and tonic in a swanky bar). >> >> Will Millie initiate a date? "Yes," she smiles. "I've had a couple of >> kisses and I'm thinking about it." Does it feel strange paying for the >> first date? "No," she says, "but then I'm not a traditionalist." >> >> Kerri, a 32-year-old editor, couldn't think of anything worse. "There >> are plenty of people who really enjoy the many and varied features of >> mobile phones, but speaking as a Luddite who almost didn't go on a >> phone plan because I had to get a phone with more than the most basic >> operations, it's not for me ... in the same way as WAP, polyphonic >> ringtones and downloading movie clips aren't for me," she says. >> >> "The kind of person who'd get into mobile dating wouldn't be my type, >> if only because he'd find me depressingly old-fashioned." >> >> It's really a matter of personal choice. And whether we want our >> personal mobiles to transform into frenzied love machines. Allowing >> the possibility of a random romance to infiltrate our lives 24/7 >> without warning may be wildly exciting for some but intrusive for >> others. >> >> "Email dating is one thing, at least things happen at a manageable >> pace," Kerri says. >> >> "Imagine if you were sitting at your desk at work and you started >> getting bombarded with text messages from someone you didn't even >> know. I bet that in a few years' time, mobile dating will not only be >> commonplace, but will have made massive advances ... for now, I'll >> stick to making my advances over the internet, or even at the pub." >> >> But you can't stop progress, especially when it comes to one of the >> most commercial markets in the world. After all, research shows that >> looking for love in cyberspace is one of the most successful ways to >> find a partner, so this seems the next logical step. And hey, why not? >> If you can manage mobile dating without looking like you're doing a >> bad Rove interview - go for it. >> >> Sue Ostler runs monthly workshops entitled Flirt with Flair. > > |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:30:34 GMT, "APR"
<I_Don't_Want_Spam@no_spam.com> wrote: >Hang in there Rod, they might get this sort of thing up for poofters yet. >Then you can have a go too. I suppose you have a problem with Asians, Blacks & Muslims too? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
You both miss the point ... Rod's an arse-hole
(AnotherRodSpeedExcretion-HeOnlyLovesExcretia) not necessarily homosexual or even human! "Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:sthn311g71gp1fcpng493ul7bdrghubrug@4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:30:34 GMT, "APR" > <I_Don't_Want_Spam@no_spam.com> wrote: > > >Hang in there Rod, they might get this sort of thing up for poofters yet. > >Then you can have a go too. > > I suppose you have a problem with Asians, Blacks & Muslims too? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
"Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:sthn311g71gp1fcpng493ul7bdrghubrug@4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:30:34 GMT, "APR" > <I_Don't_Want_Spam@no_spam.com> wrote: > > >Hang in there Rod, they might get this sort of thing up for poofters yet. > >Then you can have a go too. > > I suppose you have a problem with Asians, Blacks & Muslims too? shuddup fish-breath you can talk, you are an asian that isnt an asian |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
"Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@MySmellyJocksozdebate.com> wrote in message news:Xns961EA3977B714dddddd@130.133.1.18... > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> said > >> Wota fucking wanker. >> > > I thought that was the whole idea of it...... No surprises there.... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
$39.95 for five messages? RSVP must be fucking laughing it all the way
to the bank with all those lonely desperate fucks that are to lazy (and fucking ugly) to go to the local pub. Such technology is making people more anti-social, yet now there are companies using this technology to rape stupid lazy fuckwits, to try and make them ‘feel’ social. Brilliant I say! Anyway, if you’re sad enough to use your mobile as a primary method of getting a fuck, you deserve to live and then die a sad and lonely death. Charlie Wong wrote: > Fast flirting > By Sue Ostler > March 19, 2005 > Icon > Photo: Kate Oliver > <http://www.smh.com.au/news/Icon/Fast-flirting/2005/03/17/1110913718477.html> > > <SNIP> |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
John Smith wrote: > $39.95 for five messages? RSVP must be fucking laughing it all the way > to the bank with all those lonely desperate fucks that are to lazy (and > fucking ugly) to go to the local pub. > > Such technology is making people more anti-social, yet now there are > companies using this technology to rape stupid lazy fuckwits, to try and > make them 'feel' social. Brilliant I say! Suckers....... |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fast flirting
$39.95 for five messages
SUCKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HA HA |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RE: problems with Fast User Switching | Susan | microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support | 0 | 08-01-2005 02:23 PM |
| Re: problems with Fast User Switching | qspete | microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support | 0 | 08-01-2005 04:54 AM |
| Re: problems with Fast User Switching | qspete | microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support | 0 | 04-01-2005 10:23 AM |
| Re: problems with Fast User Switching | Damnrich | microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support | 0 | 22-11-2004 11:03 AM |
| Staff Review - 2 Fast 2 Furious | linton | DVD News and Reviews | 0 | 21-10-2003 08:10 PM |