For your PC needs
|
For your PC needs
|
|
#1
04-04-2005, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tower trouble for Hutchison
Tower trouble for Hutchison
Andrew Colley MARCH 22, 2005 <http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,12615101%5E15320%5E%5Enbv%5E15306,00.html> HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow in the state's Supreme Court. Hutchison had established 3G transmission towers by installing its equipment on the power poles of electricity provider ETSA Utilities, without council approval. Earlier this month, however, a group of South Australian local councils led by the City of Mitcham won a crucial stage of a legal bid to bring Hutchison to heel, when the full bench of the SA Supreme Court ruled that use of the power poles required council development approval. Hutchison had argued that its installations were low-impact facilities that didn't require development approval under the federal Telecommunications Act. However, the court found that the towers qualified as developments subject to local planning rules. The court's decision would allow councils to steer the towers away from residential areas, Mitcham City Council manager Ron Malcolm said. The council was concerned about the size of the towers, some of which had been built in heritage areas, he said. "We encourage them under our planning scheme to be located in commercial and industrial areas of the city," Mr Malcolm said. Other councils that provided the City of Mitcham with financial backing to mount the legal challenge were reserved about the decision late last week. "We note the decision with interests and we'll be preparing a report for consideration by elected members at their next meeting," Charles Sturt Council city services general manager Sandie Starr said. Adelaide Hills Council planning services general manager Marc Salver said the decision provided "welcome clarity". City of Burnside and Port Adelaide Enfield were unable to comment. However, Phillip Nolan, a Melbourne solicitor who specialises in telecommunications litigation, said the court's decision had given councils a "big stick" to hold over carriers. "It won't be a matter of them having to do anything. They'll just be saying to carriers that this decision's pretty clear: don't do it in future – simply apply for a permit," Mr Nolan said. Parts of the ruling could make it difficult for Hutchison to install its equipment on public infrastructure, he said. The case will go back before the Supreme Court trial judge who referred the matter to the full bench. The judge will have to decide what to do with the existing towers. The Australian 
|
|
#2
04-04-2005, 08:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower trouble for Hutchison
"Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:vu4v311be4dckmj5eu8c3n7gro5mmld5av@4ax.com... > Tower trouble for Hutchison > Andrew Colley > MARCH 22, 2005 > <http://australianit.news.com.au/arti...320%5E%5Enbv%5 E15306,00.html> > > HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance > from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow in > the state's Supreme Court. Stupid South Australians. All this means is that Hutch redirect their $$$ to other states and we get better coverage and SA people get shit Dickheads
|
|
#3
04-04-2005, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower trouble for Hutchison
"Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3Bq0e.9508$C7.350@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > "Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:vu4v311be4dckmj5eu8c3n7gro5mmld5av@4ax.com... >> Tower trouble for Hutchison >> Andrew Colley >> MARCH 22, 2005 >> > <http://australianit.news.com.au/arti...320%5E%5Enbv%5 > E15306,00.html> >> >> HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance >> from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow in >> the state's Supreme Court. > > Stupid South Australians. > All this means is that Hutch redirect their $$$ to other states and we get > better coverage and SA people get shit > > > Dickheads > > Wrong. The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide for all mobile telcos. Hutchison is, of course, appealing the decision so the game is not yet over.
|
|
#4
04-04-2005, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower trouble for Hutchison
"The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message news:4248303a$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:3Bq0e.9508$C7.350@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > > > "Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:vu4v311be4dckmj5eu8c3n7gro5mmld5av@4ax.com... > >> Tower trouble for Hutchison > >> Andrew Colley > >> MARCH 22, 2005 > >> > > <http://australianit.news.com.au/arti...320%5E%5Enbv%5 > > E15306,00.html> > >> > >> HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance > >> from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow in > >> the state's Supreme Court. > > > > Stupid South Australians. > > All this means is that Hutch redirect their $$$ to other states and we get > > better coverage and SA people get shit > > > > > > Dickheads > > > > > > Wrong. The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide for > all mobile telcos. Crap. Its a determination by the SA Supreme Court - state based decision > Hutchison is, of course, appealing the decision so the game is not yet over. Of course > >
|
|
#5
04-04-2005, 08:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower trouble for Hutchison
"Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iX12e.16057$C7.13900@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > "The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message > news:4248303a$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... >> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:3Bq0e.9508$C7.350@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >> > >> > "Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:vu4v311be4dckmj5eu8c3n7gro5mmld5av@4ax.com... >> >> Tower trouble for Hutchison >> >> Andrew Colley >> >> MARCH 22, 2005 >> >> >> > > <http://australianit.news.com.au/arti...320%5E%5Enbv%5 >> > E15306,00.html> >> >> >> >> HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance >> >> from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow in >> >> the state's Supreme Court. >> > >> > Stupid South Australians. >> > All this means is that Hutch redirect their $$$ to other states and we > get >> > better coverage and SA people get shit >> > >> > >> > Dickheads >> > >> > >> >> Wrong. The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide >> for >> all mobile telcos. > > Crap. > > Its a determination by the SA Supreme Court - state based decision > Time to go back and do Law 101 Mikey. I repeat: The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide for all mobile telcos. >> Hutchison is, of course, appealing the decision so the game is not yet > over. > > Of course > Incidentally, where would you think Hutchison is lodging its appeal? I'll pre-empt your answer - Not so knowledgeable about these things after all, are you?
|
|
#6
04-04-2005, 08:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower trouble for Hutchison
"The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message news:42499202$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:iX12e.16057$C7.13900@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >> >> "The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message >> news:4248303a$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... >>> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:3Bq0e.9508$C7.350@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >>> > >>> > "Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> > news:vu4v311be4dckmj5eu8c3n7gro5mmld5av@4ax.com... >>> >> Tower trouble for Hutchison >>> >> Andrew Colley >>> >> MARCH 22, 2005 >>> >> >>> > >> <http://australianit.news.com.au/arti...320%5E%5Enbv%5 >>> > E15306,00.html> >>> >> >>> >> HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance >>> >> from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow in >>> >> the state's Supreme Court. >>> > >>> > Stupid South Australians. >>> > All this means is that Hutch redirect their $$$ to other states and we >> get >>> > better coverage and SA people get shit >>> > >>> > >>> > Dickheads >>> > >>> > >>> >>> Wrong. The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide for >>> all mobile telcos. >> >> Crap. >> >> Its a determination by the SA Supreme Court - state based decision > Time to go back and do Law 101 Mikey. You in spades. > I repeat: The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide for > all mobile telcos. You can repeat that shit till the cows come home, changes absolutely nothing at all. The detail on what requires council approval aint national, its state based, fuckwit. >>> Hutchison is, of course, appealing the decision so the game is not yet over. >> Of course > Incidentally, where would you think Hutchison is lodging its appeal? I'll > pre-empt your answer - Not so knowledgeable about these things after all, are > you? Wota terminal fuckwit...
|
|
#7
04-04-2005, 08:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower trouble for Hutchison
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3atle6F6cq87dU1@individual.net... > > "The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message > news:42499202$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... >> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:iX12e.16057$C7.13900@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >>> >>> "The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message >>> news:4248303a$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... >>>> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:3Bq0e.9508$C7.350@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >>>> > >>>> > "Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> > news:vu4v311be4dckmj5eu8c3n7gro5mmld5av@4ax.com... >>>> >> Tower trouble for Hutchison >>>> >> Andrew Colley >>>> >> MARCH 22, 2005 >>>> >> >>>> > >>> <http://australianit.news.com.au/arti...320%5E%5Enbv%5 >>>> > E15306,00.html> >>>> >> >>>> >> HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance >>>> >> from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow >>>> >> in >>>> >> the state's Supreme Court. >>>> > >>>> > Stupid South Australians. >>>> > All this means is that Hutch redirect their $$$ to other states and >>>> > we >>> get >>>> > better coverage and SA people get shit >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Dickheads >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> Wrong. The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide >>>> for >>>> all mobile telcos. >>> >>> Crap. >>> >>> Its a determination by the SA Supreme Court - state based decision > >> Time to go back and do Law 101 Mikey. > > You in spades. > >> I repeat: The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide >> for all mobile telcos. > > You can repeat that shit till the cows come > home, changes absolutely nothing at all. > > The detail on what requires council approval > aint national, its state based, fuckwit. That is not the basis of the Hutch appeal. > >>>> Hutchison is, of course, appealing the decision so the game is not yet >>>> over. > >>> Of course > >> Incidentally, where would you think Hutchison is lodging its appeal? >> I'll pre-empt your answer - Not so knowledgeable about these things after >> all, are you? > > Wota terminal fuckwit... Clearly out of your depth, matey.
|
|
#8
04-04-2005, 08:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tower trouble for Hutchison
"The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message news:424c4754$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:3atle6F6cq87dU1@individual.net... >> >> "The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message >> news:42499202$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... >>> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:iX12e.16057$C7.13900@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >>>> >>>> "The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message >>>> news:4248303a$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... >>>>> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:3Bq0e.9508$C7.350@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >>>>> > >>>>> > "Charlie Wong" <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> > news:vu4v311be4dckmj5eu8c3n7gro5mmld5av@4ax.com... >>>>> >> Tower trouble for Hutchison >>>>> >> Andrew Colley >>>>> >> MARCH 22, 2005 >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>> <http://australianit.news.com.au/arti...320%5E%5Enbv%5 >>>>> > E15306,00.html> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> HUTCHISON Australia's 3G mobile network will face greater resistance >>>>> >> from South Australian local councils after being dealt a legal blow in >>>>> >> the state's Supreme Court. >>>>> > >>>>> > Stupid South Australians. >>>>> > All this means is that Hutch redirect their $$$ to other states and we >>>> get >>>>> > better coverage and SA people get shit >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Dickheads >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide for >>>>> all mobile telcos. >>>> >>>> Crap. >>>> >>>> Its a determination by the SA Supreme Court - state based decision >> >>> Time to go back and do Law 101 Mikey. >> >> You in spades. >> >>> I repeat: The case is precedent-setting and has implications nation-wide >>> for all mobile telcos. >> >> You can repeat that shit till the cows come >> home, changes absolutely nothing at all. >> >> The detail on what requires council approval >> aint national, its state based, fuckwit. > That is not the basis of the Hutch appeal. Bullshit. >>>>> Hutchison is, of course, appealing the decision so the game is not yet >>>>> over. >> >>>> Of course >> >>> Incidentally, where would you think Hutchison is lodging its appeal? I'll >>> pre-empt your answer - Not so knowledgeable about these things after all, >>> are you? >> >> Wota terminal fuckwit... > > Clearly out of your depth, matey. Couldnt bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag, gutless cocksucker.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Screw on Tower, do you know ? | Joe | microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support | 6 | 25-02-2005 04:53 PM |
| Trouble logging on to secure sites (Hotmail for instance) | charles grain | microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support | 1 | 28-10-2004 09:15 AM |
| Re: Gretal in trouble over saying "smartarse" on air. | The Changeling | aus.tv | 0 | 30-06-2004 09:28 AM |
| Large Casing Tower and Computer Parts f/s | MrMacabre | Old PC gear trading | 4 | 22-01-2003 05:21 PM |
