![]() |
For your PC needs
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
plasma vs lcd
Need to make a decision soon and need advice
Q. Does plasma consume far more power compared tp LCD? Q. Has LCD overcome the "smear" during fast motion? Q. Is there a definative answer to which system is best and why? (generalising) or a site that I can turn to. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
Wolf wrote:
> Need to make a decision soon and need advice > > Q. Does plasma consume far more power compared tp LCD? No. They consume a more, but not 'far more'. Getting closer all the time. > Q. Has LCD overcome the "smear" during fast motion? No. Again, they are getting better all the time though. > Q. Is there a definative answer to which system is best and why? > (generalising) > or a site that I can turn to. Nope. They are all biased in one way or the other. I like Plasma's for the main living/viewing room. but LCD's for bedrooms/small spaces. Basically LCD's are good up to a certain size, then plasmas take over. They don't directly compete with each other. Yes, there are some that cross over, but your paying big bucks for a 40" LCD and the plasmas will still give a better picture. Same as above 50" projectors are the way to go - again with a cross over. Take any LCD vs Plasma review with a grain of salt. John. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
I agreed with John. LCD are more suitable for smaller size. They are
typically heavier and collapse on their on size when too big. Plasma is able to go bigger but has some burn-in problem but hey, $5000 for 6 5 years not too bad. If you want to go bigger, projector is the way to go. John wrote: > Wolf wrote: > >> Need to make a decision soon and need advice >> >> Q. Does plasma consume far more power compared tp LCD? > > > No. They consume a more, but not 'far more'. Getting closer all the time. > >> Q. Has LCD overcome the "smear" during fast motion? > > > No. Again, they are getting better all the time though. > >> Q. Is there a definative answer to which system is best and why? >> (generalising) >> or a site that I can turn to. > > > Nope. They are all biased in one way or the other. > > I like Plasma's for the main living/viewing room. but LCD's for > bedrooms/small spaces. Basically LCD's are good up to a certain size, > then plasmas take over. They don't directly compete with each other. > Yes, there are some that cross over, but your paying big bucks for a 40" > LCD and the plasmas will still give a better picture. Same as above 50" > projectors are the way to go - again with a cross over. > > Take any LCD vs Plasma review with a grain of salt. > > John. > |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
Sony V series LCD's are the best I've seen they are out now in some Sony
stores and up to Nov 9th in other stores,up to 40 inches above that you need plasma, cheers Trevor Lees "Wolf" <Lxxs@xxx.com> wrote in message news:b7m8f.2912$Hj2.1994@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > Need to make a decision soon and need advice > > Q. Does plasma consume far more power compared tp LCD? > Q. Has LCD overcome the "smear" during fast motion? > Q. Is there a definative answer to which system is best and why? > (generalising) > or a site that I can turn to. > > > |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
I have a 42" HD plasma and it shows a fantasic picture. I would opt for
plasma at this size. I also have a 19" LCD in my bedroom and the picture does not compare. Like you say, smears when in motion. The picture on the plasma is much more fluid like. For me there is no choice. What people are saying above though is also correct, I also get to watch a 68" HD plasma on a regular basis, and although the size of it is comanding, the picture on my smaller unit does seem to be of better quality. Above 42" go projector...... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
I recently posted this in another thread :
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why would you waste so much on an LCD when the technology still is far from being perfect. I have yet to see an LCD that can do as a black as an equivalent plasma, or crt. True you can get true 1080i LCD's and not plasmas, but what do we have in Australia at the moment (bar a good PC) that takes advantage of it? Our HDtv system is still in early stages and leaves a hell of a lot to be desired. Only benefit I see in LCD is a) you can get them in sizes under 42" b) all lcd's are generally HD c) LCD's are great for computer use as you can't burn them. d) you can replace the backlighting Flip side: a) LCD's still have far from perfect blacks, I think the best ones are 800:1 b) screens are easy to damage especially with children around c) Some LCD's pump out as much heat as a plasma d) Many LCD's still suffer from poor viewing angles e) LCD's are still ridiculously expensive compared to similar plasmas f) Some LCD's still have a tendency to blur with fast movement. Granted though all LCD's are getting better every generation that comes out. Undecided : Power consumption, people say LCD's consume less however some i've encountered pump out fair amounts of heat (how does this heat affect the life of the panel itself?) - LCD's have their blacklights continuously on, whereas Plasma each pixel is always changing its light output. Has anyone have an solid figures on this? Because I've been asked this question numerous times by customers, and I find it hard to give a straight answer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At the end of the day LCD still has a long way to go, I haven't not yet seen an LCD that would convince me to invest in one, bar the 1080i sharp. I work for Harvey Norman, so on a weekly basis I get to see and compare. Mosst LCD's are good but not great, but still the plasmas rule. The new LG 37" & 42" LCD's with integrated HD tuners have ghastly pictures and poor viewing angles, the SD 42" LG with integrated tuner has a superior picture in my honest opinion. When dealing with customers I simply say if you want anything smaller than 40" you only have LCD as an option, if you want bigger unless you plan to hook your computer up to it, go a Plasma. If you want the best value for money and picture quality, a plasma is the way to go. I personally dont see a future in LCD, especially with OLED & SED on the horizon. That being said I think plasma with fade out to. I see plasma as just the transition from CRT to the next step (either OLED or SED) but as I said at the moment Plasma is the best looking flat panel tech currently available on the market and until something better comes out, I'll be putting my money on the plasma horse. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in message news:1130516284.135224.32820@g47g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > At the end of the day LCD still has a long way to go, I haven't not yet > seen an LCD that would convince me to invest in one, bar the 1080i > sharp. That's the unit that made me decide to buy plasma ;-) After being told by everyone that this was *THE* LCD to have I was very disappointed. Why would anyone pay that much for such a small screen that has issues? > > I work for Harvey Norman, That's where I bought my Pioneer 50" from. I actually had a great deal - for about 3 weeks then the price fell. BTW brand new out of the box it had 1 hot blue pixel in the main viewing area :-( Unit was swapped next day. The man from HNs was not a happy chappie - 2 unpacks and 2 home setups for one commission ;-) > I'll be putting my money on the plasma horse. I just have :-) Cheers TT |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
We got a one only for $5999 as of yesterday. They are a nice plasma,
however sitting next to the 50" Philips, the Philips has the edge. But then again the Pioneers out of the box apparently need pro calibration to make them shine. The sharp I was saw impressive, hooked up to a Chinese HVD player, picture was stunning. But at the price of $14k, it just wasn't worth it. Even the best LCDtv's at the moment can only do 800:1 contrast, the best plasmas are far ahead of that. I know how the salesdroid would've felt, I don't mind doing home setups myself you can make great money on the side doing it :) sometimes I throw it in as a freebie just to close a sale. Other times people just like the idea that the person who served them will come out and help them to (even if they have to pay) Although I hate when people expect/demand it for free, as that's offensive, it's like people don't understand petrol costs money and outside of work we do have a life. I gotta balance work life and uni life, so my time is valuable and precious and worth every $$$. Sorry i'm ranting here. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message news:4362be28$1@quokka.wn.com.au... > > "Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in message > news:1130516284.135224.32820@g47g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > >> At the end of the day LCD still has a long way to go, I > haven't not yet >> seen an LCD that would convince me to invest in one, bar > the 1080i >> sharp. > > That's the unit that made me decide to buy plasma ;-) After > being told by everyone that this was *THE* LCD to have I was > very disappointed. Why would anyone pay that much for such > a small screen that has issues? >> >> I work for Harvey Norman, > > That's where I bought my Pioneer 50" from. I actually had a > great deal - for about 3 weeks then the price fell. > > BTW brand new out of the box it had 1 hot blue pixel in the > main viewing area :-( Unit was swapped next day. The man > from HNs was not a happy chappie - 2 unpacks and 2 home > setups for one commission ;-) > >> I'll be putting my money on the plasma horse. > > I just have :-) > > Cheers TT > Got a look at the new Pioneer PDP-506HD yesterday. Looks like they haven't got a digital tuner in the box yet. :-( I would have thought Pioneer would have probably done a dual digital / analogue tuner for the benefit of country folk and of course those who watch Community Access TV (ch31). However according to the sales drone it now has HDMI (but I thought the 505 had that too??? - could be wrong but then again I don't own one.) Asking price was $7600 which isn't much down from the r.r.p. but as the guy said - "we can negotiate on that price....." Cheers, Alan |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
The 505 had/has HDMI.
Except for LG none of the other major plasma makers have integrated tuners. The new HD LG's with integrated tuners have so,so pictures. I still think the SD model with the integrated tuner has a much nicer picture. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote in message news:4362d217$0$21724$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... > > "TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message > news:4362be28$1@quokka.wn.com.au... > > > > "Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in message > > news:1130516284.135224.32820@g47g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > > > >> At the end of the day LCD still has a long way to go, I > > haven't not yet > >> seen an LCD that would convince me to invest in one, bar > > the 1080i > >> sharp. > > > > That's the unit that made me decide to buy plasma ;-) After > > being told by everyone that this was *THE* LCD to have I was > > very disappointed. Why would anyone pay that much for such > > a small screen that has issues? > >> > >> I work for Harvey Norman, > > > > That's where I bought my Pioneer 50" from. I actually had a > > great deal - for about 3 weeks then the price fell. > > > > BTW brand new out of the box it had 1 hot blue pixel in the > > main viewing area :-( Unit was swapped next day. The man > > from HNs was not a happy chappie - 2 unpacks and 2 home > > setups for one commission ;-) > > > >> I'll be putting my money on the plasma horse. > > > > I just have :-) > > > > Cheers TT > > > > Got a look at the new Pioneer PDP-506HD yesterday. I already know ;-) I have answered your post in the other forum ;-) Looks like they haven't > got a digital tuner in the box yet. :-( I would have thought Pioneer would > have probably done a dual digital / analogue tuner for the benefit of > country folk and of course those who watch Community Access TV (ch31). > However according to the sales drone it now has HDMI (but I thought the 505 > had that too??? - could be wrong but then again I don't own one.) Yes it does. If it didn't I would not have bought it. > > Asking price was $7600 which isn't much down from the r.r.p. but as the guy > said - "we can negotiate on that price....." > > Cheers, > Alan > Ahhhhh so haven't changed your name here yet? BTW cut the Simian references they're all mine :-)) Cheers TT |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in message news:1130549642.116527.197190@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com... > > I know how the salesdroid would've felt, I don't mind doing home setups > myself you can make great money on the side doing it :) sometimes I > throw it in as a freebie just to close a sale. Other times people just > like the idea that the person who served them will come out and help > them to (even if they have to pay) Although I hate when people > expect/demand it for free, as that's offensive, it's like people don't > understand petrol costs money and outside of work we do have a life. I > gotta balance work life and uni life, so my time is valuable and > precious and worth every $$$. Sorry i'm ranting here. > The way I understood it was Pioneer Oz's idea that these were set up as part of the deal. So if the deal is "That is the price delivered and set up" then that is what happens. http://www.pioneeraus.com.au/home_en...5hd/index.html "Installation included Our qualified installers will mount your plasma display in the ideal location, either on a wall or on a table-top stand. We can also customise your installation with surround sound cabling or home theatre integration (at an additional charge)." You see I read the website *first* then did the deal :-) The first time I enquired about price it was "Take my money and then throw the Plasma in the back of the car". I was also paranoid about a dead/hot pixel and as it turned out quite rightly so. Cheers TT |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
Olfda Lertih wrote:
> > The sharp I was saw impressive, hooked up to a Chinese HVD player, > picture was stunning. But at the price of $14k, it just wasn't worth > it. Even the best LCDtv's at the moment can only do 800:1 contrast, the > best plasmas are far ahead of that. > The RRP of the sharp is now $10,999 - you shoould be able to bargain quite a bit on that. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
Yer I know, when I first saw one it was $14k.
Cost on them is like $9-10k anyway, there's not very much demand for them here as far as i've seen. I myself have never had a single customer even interested in one. Neither has the store even bothered to order one for display, very few people are interested in paying $10k for an LCD, when you can have a much nicer looking plasma for $5-6K granted its not true 1080i, but as I said I haven't seen an LCD that looks as good as a plasma, yet. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message news:4363110b$1@quokka.wn.com.au... > > "Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote > in message > news:4362d217$0$21724$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... >> >> "TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message >> news:4362be28$1@quokka.wn.com.au... >> > >> > "Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in message >> > > news:1130516284.135224.32820@g47g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... >> > >> >> At the end of the day LCD still has a long way to go, I >> > haven't not yet >> >> seen an LCD that would convince me to invest in one, > bar >> > the 1080i >> >> sharp. >> > >> > That's the unit that made me decide to buy plasma ;-) > After >> > being told by everyone that this was *THE* LCD to have I > was >> > very disappointed. Why would anyone pay that much for > such >> > a small screen that has issues? >> >> >> >> I work for Harvey Norman, >> > >> > That's where I bought my Pioneer 50" from. I actually > had a >> > great deal - for about 3 weeks then the price fell. >> > >> > BTW brand new out of the box it had 1 hot blue pixel in > the >> > main viewing area :-( Unit was swapped next day. The > man >> > from HNs was not a happy chappie - 2 unpacks and 2 home >> > setups for one commission ;-) >> > >> >> I'll be putting my money on the plasma horse. >> > >> > I just have :-) >> > >> > Cheers TT >> > >> >> Got a look at the new Pioneer PDP-506HD yesterday. > > I already know ;-) I have answered your post in the other > forum ;-) > > Looks like they haven't >> got a digital tuner in the box yet. :-( I would have > thought Pioneer would >> have probably done a dual digital / analogue tuner for the > benefit of >> country folk and of course those who watch Community > Access TV (ch31). >> However according to the sales drone it now has HDMI (but > I thought the 505 >> had that too??? - could be wrong but then again I don't > own one.) > > Yes it does. If it didn't I would not have bought it. > >> >> Asking price was $7600 which isn't much down from the > r.r.p. but as the guy >> said - "we can negotiate on that price....." >> >> Cheers, >> Alan >> > > Ahhhhh so haven't changed your name here yet? BTW cut the > Simian references they're all mine :-)) > > Cheers TT > Okay Grease Monkey, why should I change my posting name here? Okay, given PA wouldn't be seen dead here I rather like being non-anonymous. That way when I post on other NGs that's likely to attract PA's attention he won't get confused about who he is going to be abusing. Just for the record, I've been using various simian nicks on the internet for years. Having been born in the year of the Monkey I have a divine claim over ownership of my nicks, so there. :P :-) Not wanting to push a point, but didn't you get given your nick by PA rather than choosing it yourself? Cheers, Alan |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
I finally got to add my other dislike of LCD's.
The screens themselves. They seem for fragile, all it would take it a little kid with a pencil, or sharp object or even playing with his toys on the screen (like kids do) can easily damage the screens. I find the membranes can be easily scratched and by god to they get dirty easily, fingerprints are a bigger pain in the ass to clean off an LCD methinks. Some lcds do come with a protective glass panel, but then this adds to the glare issue. The fact that some LCD's pump out shitloads of heat too, i've felt some screens put out similar heat to plasmas, in the long term how good is heat on lcd's? |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote in message news:4363565d$0$21733$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... > > "TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message > news:4363110b$1@quokka.wn.com.au... > > > > "Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote > > in message > > news:4362d217$0$21724$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... > >> > >> "TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message > >> news:4362be28$1@quokka.wn.com.au... > >> > > >> > "Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in message > >> > > > news:1130516284.135224.32820@g47g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > >> > > >> >> At the end of the day LCD still has a long way to go, I > >> > haven't not yet > >> >> seen an LCD that would convince me to invest in one, > > bar > >> > the 1080i > >> >> sharp. > >> > > >> > That's the unit that made me decide to buy plasma ;-) > > After > >> > being told by everyone that this was *THE* LCD to have I > > was > >> > very disappointed. Why would anyone pay that much for > > such > >> > a small screen that has issues? > >> >> > >> >> I work for Harvey Norman, > >> > > >> > That's where I bought my Pioneer 50" from. I actually > > had a > >> > great deal - for about 3 weeks then the price fell. > >> > > >> > BTW brand new out of the box it had 1 hot blue pixel in > > the > >> > main viewing area :-( Unit was swapped next day. The > > man > >> > from HNs was not a happy chappie - 2 unpacks and 2 home > >> > setups for one commission ;-) > >> > > >> >> I'll be putting my money on the plasma horse. > >> > > >> > I just have :-) > >> > > >> > Cheers TT > >> > > >> > >> Got a look at the new Pioneer PDP-506HD yesterday. > > > > I already know ;-) I have answered your post in the other > > forum ;-) > > > > Looks like they haven't > >> got a digital tuner in the box yet. :-( I would have > > thought Pioneer would > >> have probably done a dual digital / analogue tuner for the > > benefit of > >> country folk and of course those who watch Community > > Access TV (ch31). > >> However according to the sales drone it now has HDMI (but > > I thought the 505 > >> had that too??? - could be wrong but then again I don't > > own one.) > > > > Yes it does. If it didn't I would not have bought it. > > > >> > >> Asking price was $7600 which isn't much down from the > > r.r.p. but as the guy > >> said - "we can negotiate on that price....." > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Alan > >> > > > > Ahhhhh so haven't changed your name here yet? BTW cut the > > Simian references they're all mine :-)) > > > > Cheers TT > > > > Okay Grease Monkey, why should I change my posting name here? Okay, given > PA wouldn't be seen dead here I rather like being non-anonymous. That way > when I post on other NGs that's likely to attract PA's attention he won't > get confused about who he is going to be abusing. > > Just for the record, I've been using various simian nicks on the internet > for years. Having been born in the year of the Monkey I have a divine claim > over ownership of my nicks, so there. :P :-) > > Not wanting to push a point, but didn't you get given your nick by PA rather > than choosing it yourself? > > Cheers, > Alan > Truce! Wanna Banana? :-)) BTW If we are going to let PA chose our destinies then I was born in the year of the "lying, secret agenda, Autistic" Cheers Terry :-)) |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"Wolf" <Lxxs@xxx.com> wrote in message news:b7m8f.2912$Hj2.1994@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > Need to make a decision soon and need advice > > Q. Does plasma consume far more power compared tp LCD? More yes. Far more? No > Q. Has LCD overcome the "smear" during fast motion? No, and there are bigger problems. The picture looks terrible and the blacks are only dark grey even on the most expensive LCD panels. > Q. Is there a definative answer to which system is best and why? > (generalising) > or a site that I can turn to. No there is no definitive answer but I believe that a DLP RPTV is the best value for money at the moment. Not quite the blacks of a CRT but the "film-like" picture quality is fantastic. Far better than any plasma. The only drawback is expensive lamp replacment every 6000 hours. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message news:436383c3@quokka.wn.com.au... > > "Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote > in message > news:4363565d$0$21733$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... >> >> "TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message >> news:4363110b$1@quokka.wn.com.au... >> > >> > "Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> > wrote >> > in message >> > > news:4362d217$0$21724$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au... >> >> >> >> "TT" <TTencerNOSPAM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message >> >> news:4362be28$1@quokka.wn.com.au... >> >> > >> >> > "Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in > message >> >> > >> > > news:1130516284.135224.32820@g47g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... >> >> > >> >> >> At the end of the day LCD still has a long way to > go, I >> >> > haven't not yet >> >> >> seen an LCD that would convince me to invest in one, >> > bar >> >> > the 1080i >> >> >> sharp. >> >> > >> >> > That's the unit that made me decide to buy plasma ;-) >> > After >> >> > being told by everyone that this was *THE* LCD to > have I >> > was >> >> > very disappointed. Why would anyone pay that much > for >> > such >> >> > a small screen that has issues? >> >> >> >> >> >> I work for Harvey Norman, >> >> > >> >> > That's where I bought my Pioneer 50" from. I > actually >> > had a >> >> > great deal - for about 3 weeks then the price fell. >> >> > >> >> > BTW brand new out of the box it had 1 hot blue pixel > in >> > the >> >> > main viewing area :-( Unit was swapped next day. > The >> > man >> >> > from HNs was not a happy chappie - 2 unpacks and 2 > home >> >> > setups for one commission ;-) >> >> > >> >> >> I'll be putting my money on the plasma horse. >> >> > >> >> > I just have :-) >> >> > >> >> > Cheers TT >> >> > >> >> >> >> Got a look at the new Pioneer PDP-506HD yesterday. >> > >> > I already know ;-) I have answered your post in the > other >> > forum ;-) >> > >> > Looks like they haven't >> >> got a digital tuner in the box yet. :-( I would have >> > thought Pioneer would >> >> have probably done a dual digital / analogue tuner for > the >> > benefit of >> >> country folk and of course those who watch Community >> > Access TV (ch31). >> >> However according to the sales drone it now has HDMI > (but >> > I thought the 505 >> >> had that too??? - could be wrong but then again I don't >> > own one.) >> > >> > Yes it does. If it didn't I would not have bought it. >> > >> >> >> >> Asking price was $7600 which isn't much down from the >> > r.r.p. but as the guy >> >> said - "we can negotiate on that price....." >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Alan >> >> >> > >> > Ahhhhh so haven't changed your name here yet? BTW cut > the >> > Simian references they're all mine :-)) >> > >> > Cheers TT >> > >> >> Okay Grease Monkey, why should I change my posting name > here? Okay, given >> PA wouldn't be seen dead here I rather like being > non-anonymous. That way >> when I post on other NGs that's likely to attract PA's > attention he won't >> get confused about who he is going to be abusing. >> >> Just for the record, I've been using various simian nicks > on the internet >> for years. Having been born in the year of the Monkey I > have a divine claim >> over ownership of my nicks, so there. :P :-) >> >> Not wanting to push a point, but didn't you get given your > nick by PA rather >> than choosing it yourself? >> >> Cheers, >> Alan >> > Truce! Wanna Banana? :-)) > > BTW If we are going to let PA chose our destinies then I was > born in the year of the "lying, secret agenda, Autistic" > > Cheers Terry :-)) > Just as I thought ;-) |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: plasma vs lcd
"Olfda Lertih" <cmwmjt@netspace.net.au> wrote in message news:1130584705.406208.240390@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... >I finally got to add my other dislike of LCD's. > > The screens themselves. They seem for fragile, all it would take it a > little kid with a pencil, or sharp object or even playing with his toys > on the screen (like kids do) can easily damage the screens. I find the > membranes can be easily scratched and by god to they get dirty easily, > fingerprints are a bigger pain in the ass to clean off an LCD methinks. > > Some lcds do come with a protective glass panel, but then this adds to > the glare issue. > > The fact that some LCD's pump out shitloads of heat too, i've felt some > screens put out similar heat to plasmas, in the long term how good is > heat on lcd's? What about the noise of a plasma screen? Listen to one in a quiet environment. You may be surprised. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Plasma or LCD | The Don | aus.dvd | 41 | 23-04-2005 05:33 AM |
| Plasma versus LCD longevity - Plasma wins | Sam Richards | aus.audio-visual.home-cinema | 59 | 22-03-2005 06:07 PM |
| LCD Vs Plasma | Ray | aus.tv.digital | 62 | 25-02-2004 07:09 PM |
| Plasma vs LCD | Les | aus.tv.digital | 28 | 03-02-2004 08:55 PM |
| Re: Plasma vs LCD?????? | Les | aus.tv.digital | 1 | 26-01-2004 05:36 AM |